What is A.D. to Me? (Why Jesus was born in 4 B.C)
You may have never thought about it, but the Bible does not contain any year designations, like the year 2008. That is because the system of counting years which we use did not develop until the 500s, and then it didn’t really catch on until a couple of hundred years after that. The guy who developed the A.D. system was named Dionysius Exiguus (470-544), but more about him and why he felt it necessary to develop the A.D. system later.
I said that the Bible does not contain any year designations, but it does use an old way of keeping track of the years. This method is known as the regnal system and is based on indicating an event within the reign of a ruler. For instance, “such-and-such occurred in the fifth year of King Whoever.” A great example of this is in Luke 3:1-2. In those passages, Luke is attempting to tell when “the word of God came to John [the Baptist] son of Zechariah in the desert.” As you read this, you will see Luke describing this event within the rule of a number of people: “In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar—when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, Herod tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and Traconitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene—during the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John son of Zechariah in the desert.”
Luke is very specific here, because he dates the call of John within the reigns of seven different people! This system worked well as long as you knew when the rulers ruled, but as time passed and people begin to forget these rulers, they also forgot the dates when they ruled. Eventually the rule of Emperor Diocletian in 325 was used as year one. And that was accepted for awhile.
Now to Dionysius. Dionysius was a monk who helped keep track of the day when Easter was celebrated. (Which was a difficult thing when you don't have a regular calendar.) In all of his calculating, he decided to change the counting of years which was based on Diocletian. Why? Because Diocletian had severely persecuted Christians. Therefore, Dionysius developed a system of counting years not based on Diocletian but based on the birth of Jesus. Thus Dionysius began his calendar with Anno Domini (“In the year of the Lord”) 1. He first began using this system in the year AD 525. (Which means that you will never find any dates using the AD system before the year 525. In other words, the people living in the year 524 didn’t realize it.)
Dionysius’ system was mainly theoretical at that time, and did not have a wide appeal. But in the early 700s a man named Venerable Bede wrote a history book which used Dionysius’ system, and soon afterwards this dating system was widely accepted.
Now about Jesus. Dionysius decided to start the calendar by calling the birth of Jesus year 1. But as archaeology developed in the 1800s and 1900s, scholars began to be able to date people and events in the distant past with more accuracy. And they came to the conclusion that King Herod the Great died in the year 4 BC. Well, since Herod was live when Jesus was born, this pushed the date of Jesus back to 4 BC (or maybe even a couple of years earlier). So the reason scholars say that Jesus was born in the year 4 BC (and some say 5, 6, or even 7 BC) is that Dionysius got it wrong 4, 5, 6, or 7 years. Which isn't too bad considering he came up with the system in the Dark Ages.
Read on to learn more about the leap year (you only think you know the rule). So the way to keep track of years was established, but some tweaking with the length of the year became necessary. The calendar used by Dionysius is known as the Julian calendar and has three years of 365 days, then one year of 366 days, which we know as the leap year. Problem: the Julian calendar assumes that each year is 365.25 days long, but it is actually 365.2425, just a bit shorter. So if you add a day every four years, you will slowly add too much.
By the 1500s, it was apparent that too many days had been added. Therefore, Pope Gregory XIII decided that the day after October 4, 1582 would be October 15, 1582. And, to make sure this mistake didn’t happen again, they adjusted the leap year rule. No longer would an extra day automatically be added to every fourth year. From then on, an extra day would be added to every fourth year unless the year ended in “00”, then an extra day would not be added, unless the year could be evenly divided by 400, when an extra day would be added. So, 1900 was not a leap year but 2000 was.
©2010 Mark Nickens
Questions/comments contact Mark at email@example.com
To go to Summaries Home click here.
To go to First Century click here.